We’ve worked with and assessed executive and operational teams around the world for more than 15 years now. Across industries, cultures and leadership teams.

Recently, we paused to look back at the data.

More than 400 team assessments involving over 3,300 leaders from mining, financial services, retail, logistics, technology, education, manufacturing, energy, public sector organisations, family businesses and large corporates.

And one question:

What actually separates functional teams from high-performing ones?

Understanding that difference really matters to us.

It’s why we’ve dedicated ourselves to understanding what governs team performance – and to building practical tools and experiences that help teams move from simply functioning to genuinely thriving.

The findings were fascinating.

First, most teams are not broken.

In fact, many teams are reasonably aligned. They are filled with smart, capable people who care about the business. They work hard. Most are good at commitment and execution. They know what needs to get done.

But that’s not what holds them back.

One of the clearest recurring patterns across the assessments was this:

  • Teams often struggled with peer accountability.

More specifically, with addressing one another directly and courageously when behaviour was getting in the way of performance.

Again and again, across industries and seniority levels, one behaviour consistently appeared among the weakest scoring areas:

  • “Team members point out one another’s behaviours that hold the team back.”

That was the pattern.

  • Not strategy.

  • Not intelligence.

  • Not capability.

But, behavioural courage.

Most teams would rather preserve harmony than make one another uncomfortable.

It’s here where performance quietly stalls.

A related pattern emerged repeatedly … the teams that appeared most cohesive and high-performing were also the team’s most willing to engage in healthy debate* and challenge one another directly.

*We call these P.U.D.L’s: Passionate Unfiltered Debates combined with Listening.

The difference between an average team and a truly cohesive one is not whether people are nice to one another. It’s whether they’re willing to talk about the things that really matter.

The best teams:

  • speak honestly and directly when something isn’t working,

  • debate openly,

  • address issues quickly,

  • hold high standards and protect them vigorously.

But they do this with respect and humanity.

This is the defining characteristic of an exceptional team.

The defining characteristic

There is an obvious tension here.

How can you show care yet also be rigorous around performance and delivery?

Yet it’s in mastering this tension that team excellence is established. It’s also what creates the conditions for people to grow and mature.

The two need each other.

  • Accountability without respect becomes aggression. Fear and compliance follow.

  • Respect without accountability often leads to mediocrity and drifting standards.

Teams that learn to harness this tension are truly rare. Yet when you have worked in one, the experience stays with you forever.

Alignment vs Accountability

We made another interesting discovery. Many teams improve alignment far faster than they improve accountability.

Alignment is the hardware of team performance:

  • direction,

  • priorities,

  • decisions,

  • metrics,

  • clarity on what needs to happen.

Most teams can improve this relatively quickly.

Accountability is the software … and it brings us back to the tension.

It reveals itself when commitments slip, standards drop, or behaviour starts hurting the team. Accountability is about how people respond in those moments.

Whether they speak up. Whether they challenge directly. Whether they hold one another to the standards the team agreed to. And how they go about doing this.

That’s where the behavioural courage is required.

In conclusion

  • Most teams we assessed can do the things that keep the wheels turning.

  • Far fewer can do the things that make the team exceptional.

That’s the real breakthrough work.

  • The courage to challenge one another with honesty and respect.
  • The discipline to hold high standards.
  • And the willingness to have the P.U.D.L’s that matter.

That’s what unlocks a team’s true potential.

It’s also what transforms the people within it too.

We love hearing from you. Please comment below or mail me at

Have you ever worked in a team that harnessed this tension – or failed to do so?
I’d love to know.

4 Comments

  1. Xavier 1 June 2026 at 10:53 pm - Reply

    A great read. How can you ensure congregants in church become accountable? Some of them report to higher offices or change church when you start focusing on accountability.

    • Grant Ashfield 19 June 2026 at 1:26 pm - Reply

      HI Xavier – thank you. Yes sometimes the greatest challenges around accountability lie in non corporate environments – especially when there is a volunteer or serving mindset. It’s much harder here. I appreciate your comment – thank you, Grant

  2. Brooke Struck 16 June 2026 at 11:02 pm - Reply

    Some really interesting observations here! One thing that stands out to me: broadly speaking, you say that alignment is generally fine but accountability is low.

    What are the ways in which alignment is missing in order to “set the stage” for that accountability? Have they aligned on how they will monitor performance, where those conversations, how they will hold each other to account (in ways that balance respect with high expectations)?

    I suspect part of the solution still lies in the alignment stage, to “ease the burden” of accountability conversations later on (by building on agreements we hashed out beforehand).

    • Grant Ashfield 19 June 2026 at 1:24 pm - Reply

      HI Brooke – thanks for your comment. The alignment is the intellectual agreement. In some cases it’s also ‘false alignment’ – agreeing for the sake of not disagreeing. So as you point out the accountability challenge is already baked into the aligning. I like your concept of ‘setting the stage easing the burden.’ More needs to be done here to agree in advance how to handle non performance etc. Thank you for a great comment. Grant

Leave A Comment

The LeadershipWorks Blog

Do you want to build a healthy organisation? Do you want to make teamwork your ultimate source of competitive advantage?

Latest Posts